Đi thẳng đến nội dung

‘Better-practice’ Concessions? Some Lessons from Cambodia’s Leopard Skin Landscape

This article focuses on two cases where companies have sought to develop more socially benign––and, they believe, more profitable and sustainable––plantation concessions in a context that is still marred by extensive land conflict. The first is the Mong Reththy Investment Cambodia Oil Palm (MRICOP) Company (Preah Sihanouk province); the second is the Grandis Timber Company (Kampong Speu province). We examine each case empirically, investigating how two well-intentioned yet strategically oriented companies navigate the complex landscape of multiple entitlements and competing claims that lurk beneath the surface of state ownership in Cambodia’s rural hinterland. In doing so, we interrogate the private sector’s role in helping address the state land problem, both in Cambodia and elsewhere.

Data Resources (1)

Data Resource Preview - ‘Better-practice’ Concessions? Some Lessons from Cambodia’s Leopard Skin Landscape

Thông tin khác

Miền Giá trị
Loại tài liệu Case studies
Ngôn ngữ
  • Tiếng Anh
Chủ đề
  • Concessions
  • Economic land concessions and plantations
  • Foreign investors
  • Land and housing rights and evictions
  • State public land
Vùng địa lý (phạm vi không gian)
  • Campuchia
Bản quyền To be determined
Phiên bản/Lần xuất bản 1.0
Giấy phép CC-BY-3.0-IGO
Liên hệ

Revues.org is a platform for journals in the humanities and social sciences run by the CLEO, Centre for open electronic publishing (CNRS, EHESS, UP, UAPV).

http://poldev.revues.org/ http://www.revues.org/

Đồng tác giả (cá nhân) Michael B. Dwyer, Emily Polack and Sokbunthoeun So
Nhà xuất bản Institut de hautes études internationales et du développement
Ngày xuất bản 2015
Đánh số trang 18
Các từ khóa Social Land Concessions,Grandis Timber,Mong Reththy,political economy
Ngày đăng tải tháng 5 5, 2017, 07:01 (UTC)
Ngày chỉnh sửa, cập nhật tháng 5 5, 2017, 07:06 (UTC)